BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//EuroSEAS 2022//EN
X-WR-CALNAME:EuroSEAS 2022
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20240426T060500
UID:euroseas-2022-intellectuals-in-intercontinental-conversations-1
SUMMARY:Intellectuals in Intercontinental Conversations (1)
LOCATION:Room 3.06
DESCRIPTION:In an attempt to redeem thinking from the normative discipline 
 of philosophy, the Filipino Jesuit philosopher Fr. Roque Ferriols, S.J. re-
 writes the Platonic dialogue, replacing the exchange between the iconic mas
 ter philosopher Socrates and the quintessential ignorant pupil with a conve
 rsation between two nondescript characters, “A” and “B.” Before the designa
 tion of roles and titles or the establishment of any corpus, the search for
  knowledge takes place in the encounter between persons, and ideas are born
  in the process of speaking and talking back to each other in the intimacy 
 of an intellectual conversation. \n\nPostcolonial/ decolonial theories have
  highlighted the politics of discourse, and have heightened our awareness o
 f the epistemic violence that subalternizes non-Western agency and thought,
  sometimes to the point, however, that systemic oppression and silencing al
 one appear to define knowledge production. But as has been richly shown in 
 more grounded scholarship on Southeast Asia, engagement with Western ideas 
 have led not simply to a slavish submission to the influence of the other, 
 but to localisation in two senses: as a creative adaptation of ideas that l
 eads to the emergence of what Sumarsam calls the “mestizo culture” of fruit
 ful intercultural dialogues; and Zeus Salazar’s pagpopook (pook, “place”), 
 which involves an articulation of difference, an untranslatability of exper
 ience, and an affirmation of a self consciousness. \n\nThis panel aims to e
 xplore historical encounters of Southeast Asian intellectuals with Western 
 interlocutors, with attention not only to the power structures that defined
  their relation, but also to the complexity and liveliness of conversations
 , which may transform, disturb, and/or inspire both thinkers, and where thi
 nking grows from the back-and-forth of an encounter. The contribution of th
 is panel lies in its focused, grounded questioning of the particular dynami
 cs and transformative mutuality of each encounter. To retain a sufficiently
  sharp focus, we are limiting the scope of our conversations to thinkers wh
 o lived in the same times and communicated with each other (thus, the likes
  of Socrates are excluded).
URL:https://euroseas2022.org/panels/intellectuals-in-intercontinental-conversations
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220701T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220701T103000
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20240426T060500
UID:euroseas-2022-intellectuals-in-intercontinental-conversations-2
SUMMARY:Intellectuals in Intercontinental Conversations (2)
LOCATION:Room 3.06
DESCRIPTION:In an attempt to redeem thinking from the normative discipline 
 of philosophy, the Filipino Jesuit philosopher Fr. Roque Ferriols, S.J. re-
 writes the Platonic dialogue, replacing the exchange between the iconic mas
 ter philosopher Socrates and the quintessential ignorant pupil with a conve
 rsation between two nondescript characters, “A” and “B.” Before the designa
 tion of roles and titles or the establishment of any corpus, the search for
  knowledge takes place in the encounter between persons, and ideas are born
  in the process of speaking and talking back to each other in the intimacy 
 of an intellectual conversation. \n\nPostcolonial/ decolonial theories have
  highlighted the politics of discourse, and have heightened our awareness o
 f the epistemic violence that subalternizes non-Western agency and thought,
  sometimes to the point, however, that systemic oppression and silencing al
 one appear to define knowledge production. But as has been richly shown in 
 more grounded scholarship on Southeast Asia, engagement with Western ideas 
 have led not simply to a slavish submission to the influence of the other, 
 but to localisation in two senses: as a creative adaptation of ideas that l
 eads to the emergence of what Sumarsam calls the “mestizo culture” of fruit
 ful intercultural dialogues; and Zeus Salazar’s pagpopook (pook, “place”), 
 which involves an articulation of difference, an untranslatability of exper
 ience, and an affirmation of a self consciousness. \n\nThis panel aims to e
 xplore historical encounters of Southeast Asian intellectuals with Western 
 interlocutors, with attention not only to the power structures that defined
  their relation, but also to the complexity and liveliness of conversations
 , which may transform, disturb, and/or inspire both thinkers, and where thi
 nking grows from the back-and-forth of an encounter. The contribution of th
 is panel lies in its focused, grounded questioning of the particular dynami
 cs and transformative mutuality of each encounter. To retain a sufficiently
  sharp focus, we are limiting the scope of our conversations to thinkers wh
 o lived in the same times and communicated with each other (thus, the likes
  of Socrates are excluded).
URL:https://euroseas2022.org/panels/intellectuals-in-intercontinental-conversations
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220701T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220701T123000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR