The scope of diplomacy in pre-nineteenth century insular Southeast Asia: from treaty making to land bargaining

Type

Double Panel

Part 1

Session 9
Fri 11:00-12:30 Room 0.16

Part 2

Session 10
Fri 14:00-15:30 Room 0.16

Conveners

Discussant

Save This Event

Add to Calendar

Part 1

Part 2

Show Paper Abstracts

Abstract

In recent years the study of historical diplomatic relations has been revitalized. Inspired by actor-based and discourse critical approaches, historians, anthropologists, and international relations scholars have expanded the study of Southeast Asian inter-polity relations, highlighting the importance of kinship, opportunist alliances linked to colonial power dynamics, local religious concerns, and flexible ad-hoc strategies of gift-giving. From the sixteenth century onwards, negotiation processes using traditional, imported and hybrid practices alike left a lasting imprint on the socio-economic realities on the ground. Consequently, a versatile set of foreign policies, diplomatic practices including soft power, conflict management and knowledge gathering, and spatial relations developed in maritime Asia. The aim of this panel is to discuss the ‘political cultures’ implied by these usages. It intends to bring to a better understanding and a better definition of the relationships between Europeans and Southeast Asian rulers, often described along the simple dichotomy of superiority versus inferiority. Instead of domination, which already set the mode of interpretation, the panel proposes the use of negotiation and conciliation as a frame of analysis to consider the versatility of the relation, while at the same time being attuned to the significance of unequal power relations and coercive practices, such as ‘gunboat diplomacy’. Discussing the concepts of power, authority and sovereignty, this panel will focus on uncovering the implication of words and acts in diplomatic and trading relations between Southeast Asian rulers and their counterparts, to bring new lights on Euro-Asian encounters and potentially reshape our understanding of its nature.

Keywords